American Bank of Commerce v. Danny S. Davis

Court of Appeals of Texas

American Bank of Commerce v. Danny S. Davis

DecidedMarch 7, 2008

Docket03-07-00264-CV

StatusPublished

This text of American Bank of Commerce v. Danny S. Davis (American Bank of Commerce v. Danny S. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

American Bank of Commerce v. Danny S. Davis, (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-07-00264-CV

American Bank of Commerce, Appellant

v.

Danny S. Davis, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 200TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-GN-03-003789, HONORABLE ORLINDA NARANJO, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

The portion of the reporter's record to be prepared by Robin Carter is overdue. This Court's clerk has sent a late notice to Carter requesting a response and has left telephone messages requesting a response. Carter has not responded. This Court's clerk has been informed by another reporter who prepared a portion of the record in this case that Carter has not returned her telephone calls.⁽¹⁾ Her failure to prepare the record or to communicate with this Court despite numerous entreaties by different means over the course of several months has left this appeal in limbo.

Robin Carter is ORDERED to prepare and file the portion of the record in this appeal for which she is responsible no later than April 7, 2008. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(a)(1). If the portion of the record for which Carter is responsible is not filed by April 7, 2008, she may be required to appear and show cause why she should not be held in contempt of this Court.

It is ORDERED March 7, 2008.

__________________________________________

G. Alan Waldrop, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Pemberton and Waldrop

1. We also note that Carter has failed to prepare records in at least three other appeals currently pending in this Court. Despite this Court's inquiries, orders, and admonishment in those cases that she could be held in contempt of court for failing to prepare the record when ordered to do so, she has neither prepared the records, explained that failure, nor responded in any way other than silence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-07-00264-CV

American Bank of Commerce, Appellant

v.

Danny S. Davis, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 200TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-GN-03-003789, HONORABLE ORLINDA NARANJO, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

The portion of the reporter's record to be prepared by Robin Carter is overdue. This Court's clerk has sent a late notice to Carter requesting a response and has left telephone messages requesting a response. Carter has not responded. This Court's clerk has been informed by another reporter who prepared a portion of the record in this case that Carter has not returned her telephone calls.⁽¹⁾ Her failure to prepare the record or to communicate with this Court despite numerous entreaties by different means over the course of several months has left this appeal in limbo.

Robin Carter is ORDERED to prepare and file the portion of the record in this appeal for which she is responsible no later than April 7, 2008. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(a)(1). If the portion of the record for which Carter is responsible is not filed by April 7, 2008, she may be required to appear and show cause why she should not be held in contempt of this Court.

It is ORDERED March 7, 2008.

__________________________________________

G. Alan Waldrop, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Pemberton and Waldrop

1. We also note that Carter has failed to prepare records in at least three other appeals currently pending in this Court. Despite this Court's inquiries, orders, and admonishment in those cases that she could be held in contempt of court for failing to prepare the record when ordered to do so, she has neither prepared the records, explained that failure, nor responded in any way other than silence.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

American Bank of Commerce v. Danny S. Davis, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-bank-of-commerce-v-danny-s-davis-texapp-2008.