American Ball Bearing Corp. v. Hewes & Penn Corp.
This text of 283 A.D. 1068 (American Ball Bearing Corp. v. Hewes & Penn Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— -Action by former tenants under a lease, terminated by a condemnation proceeding instituted by the City of New York, to recover by way of damages a substantial portion of the condemnation award. Plaintiffs claim that said portion justly belongs to them but was wrongfully received by defendant. Defendant appeals from an order denying its motion for summary judgment under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. The action essentially is one to recover damages based on common-law fraud and deceit. In such an action, rule 113 does not authorize the granting of summary judgment unless a defense has been interposed which is founded on facts established by documentary evidence or official record. Moreover, in an action of that character the parol evidence rule has no application and may not be invoked to bar proof of the fraud. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Schmidt and Murphy, JJ., concur. Beldock, J., not voting. [See 284 App. Div. 848.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
283 A.D. 1068, 131 N.Y.S.2d 295, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6339, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-ball-bearing-corp-v-hewes-penn-corp-nyappdiv-1954.