Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/American Atlantic Lines v. Ros Forwarding, Inc.

American Atlantic Lines v. Ros Forwarding, Inc.

441 So. 2d 1153, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24227
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 22, 1983
DocketNo. 83-42
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 441 So. 2d 1153 (American Atlantic Lines v. Ros Forwarding, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
American Atlantic Lines v. Ros Forwarding, Inc., 441 So. 2d 1153, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24227 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. The statute of frauds prohibits actions based on unwritten promises to pay the debts of third parties in the absence of any independent consideration running to the guarantor. § 725.01, Fla.Stat. (1981); Baya v. Price, 222 So.2d 258 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969); cf. Jim & Slim’s Tool Supply, Inc. v. Metro Communities Corp., 328 So.2d 213, 215 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Riba v. Pila
543 So. 2d 429 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Jose Anglada and Isaura Anglada, His Wife v. Wilma Sprague, and Harry A. Wright, John Doe, Richard Roe
822 F.2d 1035 (Eleventh Circuit, 1987)
Review Financial Printers, Inc. v. Feldman
478 So. 2d 517 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
441 So. 2d 1153, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24227, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-atlantic-lines-v-ros-forwarding-inc-fladistctapp-1983.