American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee v. Reno

132 F.3d 531, 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9616, 97 Daily Journal DAR 15391, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 36154
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided December 23, 1997·No. Nos. 96-55929, 97-55479·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

Order; Dissent by Judge O’SCANNLAIN.

[532]*532ORDER

The members of the panel that decided this case voted unanimously to deny the petition for rehearing and all recommended rejection of the suggestion for rehearing en banc.

The full court was advised of the suggestion for rehearing en bane. An active judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. (Fed. R.App. P. 35.)

The petition for rehearing is denied and the suggestion for rehearing en banc is rejected.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee v. Reno, 132 F.3d 531, 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9616, 97 Daily Journal DAR 15391, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 36154 (9th Cir. 1997).

132 F.3d 531 (American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee v. Reno) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related