American Agricultural Chemical Co. v. Pocahontas Coal Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

American Agricultural Chemical Co. v. Pocahontas Coal Corp.

256 A.D. 946, 10 N.Y.S.2d 298, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5580

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 28, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 256 A.D. 946 (American Agricultural Chemical Co. v. Pocahontas Coal Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

American Agricultural Chemical Co. v. Pocahontas Coal Corp., 256 A.D. 946, 10 N.Y.S.2d 298, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5580 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

This is a controversy submitted on an agreed statement of facts pursuant to sections 546-548 of the Civil Practice Act. The following two questions were submitted: 1. Does the reservation in the lease give the plaintiff the right to have vessels, barges or other carriers, moored or docked alongside the bulkhead in front of said five (5) foot strip, overlap onto the bulkhead beyond said five (5) foot strip? 2. Is the said right reserved in the lease assignable by the plaintiff? Both questions are answered in the affirmative and judgment unanimously directed for plaintiff, without costs. Present — Hagarty, Davis, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This is a controversy submitted on an agreed statement of facts pursuant to sections 546-548 of the Civil Practice Act. The following two questions were submitted: 1. Does the reservation in the lease give the plaintiff the right to have vessels, barges or other carriers, moored or docked alongside the bulkhead in front of said five (5) foot strip, overlap onto the bulkhead beyond said five (5) foot strip? 2. Is the said right reserved in the lease assignable by the plaintiff? Both questions are answered in the affirmative and judgment unanimously directed for plaintiff, without costs. Present — Hagarty, Davis, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

256 A.D. 946, 10 N.Y.S.2d 298, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5580, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/american-agricultural-chemical-co-v-pocahontas-coal-corp-nyappdiv-1939.