Ameranth, Inc. v. Pizza Hut, Inc.
This text of Ameranth, Inc. v. Pizza Hut, Inc. (Ameranth, Inc. v. Pizza Hut, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Case No.: 11cv1810 DMS (WVG) IN RE: AMERANTH PATENT
12 LITIGATION CASES, ORDER FOLLOWING STATUS 13 CONFERENCE 14 15 16 A telephonic status conference was held on December 2, 2021. After hearing from 17 counsel for the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 18 1. The stay imposed in the Court’s October 23, 2020 Order (ECF No. 1491) is lifted. 19 2. Consistent with In re Katz Interactive Call Processing Patent Litig., 639 F.3d 1303, 20 1311-13 (Fed. Cir. 2011), and Nuance Communications, Inc. v. ABBYY USA Software 21 House, Inc., 813 F.3d 1368 (Fed. Cir. 2016), Ameranth is ordered to show cause why it 22 should be allowed to reassert any claims that were not selected in response to the Court’s 23 February 14, 2017 Order. (See ECF No. 623) (directing Ameranth to select up to five 24 claims for assertion against each Defendant). Ameranth shall file its response to this order 25 on or before December 9, 2021. Defendants shall file an omnibus brief in response to 26 / / / 27 / / / 28 / / / 1 || Ameranth’s brief on or before December 16, 2021. The parties’ briefs on this issue shall 2 || be no more than fifteen (15) pages, respectively. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 ||Dated: December 2, 2021 em Dh 5 an Yn. Hon. Dana M. Sabraw, Chief Judge 6 United States District Court 7 8 9 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ameranth, Inc. v. Pizza Hut, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ameranth-inc-v-pizza-hut-inc-casd-2021.