Ameranth, Inc. v. Pizza Hut, Inc.

S.D. California

Ameranth, Inc. v. Pizza Hut, Inc.

District Court, S.D. California·Decided December 2, 2021·No. 3:11-cv-01810·Unknown

Opinion

Case No.: 11cv1810 DMS (WVG) IN RE: AMERANTH PATENT

ORDER FOLLOWING STATUS A telephonic status conference was held on December 2, 2021. After hearing from counsel for the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The stay imposed in the Court’s October 23, 2020 Order (ECF No. 1491) is lifted. 2. Consistent with In re Katz Interactive Call Processing Patent Litig., 639 F.3d 1303, 1311-13 (Fed. Cir. 2011), and Nuance Communications, Inc. v. ABBYY USA Software House, Inc., 813 F.3d 1368 (Fed. Cir. 2016), Ameranth is ordered to show cause why it should be allowed to reassert any claims that were not selected in response to the Court’s February 14, 2017 Order. (See ECF No. 623) (directing Ameranth to select up to five claims for assertion against each Defendant). Ameranth shall file its response to this order on or before December 9, 2021. Defendants shall file an omnibus brief in response to / / / / / / / / / Ameranth’s brief on or before December 16, 2021. The parties’ briefs on this issue shall be no more than fifteen (15) pages, respectively. Dated: December 2, 2021 em Dh an Yn. Hon. Dana M. Sabraw, Chief Judge United States District Court 1]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Case No.: 11cv1810 DMS (WVG) IN RE: AMERANTH PATENT

ORDER FOLLOWING STATUS A telephonic status conference was held on December 2, 2021. After hearing from counsel for the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The stay imposed in the Court’s October 23, 2020 Order (ECF No. 1491) is lifted. 2. Consistent with In re Katz Interactive Call Processing Patent Litig., 639 F.3d 1303, 1311-13 (Fed. Cir. 2011), and Nuance Communications, Inc. v. ABBYY USA Software House, Inc., 813 F.3d 1368 (Fed. Cir. 2016), Ameranth is ordered to show cause why it should be allowed to reassert any claims that were not selected in response to the Court’s February 14, 2017 Order. (See ECF No. 623) (directing Ameranth to select up to five claims for assertion against each Defendant). Ameranth shall file its response to this order on or before December 9, 2021. Defendants shall file an omnibus brief in response to / / / / / / / / / Ameranth’s brief on or before December 16, 2021. The parties’ briefs on this issue shall be no more than fifteen (15) pages, respectively. Dated: December 2, 2021 em Dh an Yn. Hon. Dana M. Sabraw, Chief Judge United States District Court 1]

Ameranth, Inc. v. Pizza Hut, Inc., (S.D. Cal. 2021).

Pincite

Ameranth, Inc. v. Pizza Hut, Inc. (Ameranth, Inc. v. Pizza Hut, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related