Ameranth, Inc. v. Menusoft System Corp.

463 F. App'x 920
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedJanuary 13, 2012
DocketNos. 2011-1469, 2011-1502
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 463 F. App'x 920 (Ameranth, Inc. v. Menusoft System Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ameranth, Inc. v. Menusoft System Corp., 463 F. App'x 920 (Fed. Cir. 2012).

Opinion

ON MOTION

LINN, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

Ameranth, Inc. moves without opposition to remand these appeals due to settlement.

Ameranth states that the parties settled the case and requested an indicative ruling from the district court, pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 62.1, whether the district court would defer, deny, or grant a motion to vacate the underlying judgment if the case were remanded. The district court indicated pursuant to Rule 62.1(a)(3) that it would grant the motion.

Upon consideration thereof,

It Is Ordered That:

(1) The motion is granted. The case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings as may be appropriate.

(2) Any other pending motions in this court are moot.

(3) Each side shall bear its own costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Amberson v. McAllen
W.D. Texas, 2022

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
463 F. App'x 920, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ameranth-inc-v-menusoft-system-corp-cafc-2012.