Amer v. Superior Court of California ex rel. County of Los Angeles

Supreme Court

Amer v. Superior Court of California ex rel. County of Los Angeles

334 U.S. 813, 68 S. Ct. 1069, 92 L. Ed. 1744, 1948 U.S. LEXIS 2232

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedMay 10, 1948

DocketNo. 429; No. 430

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 334 U.S. 813 (Amer v. Superior Court of California ex rel. County of Los Angeles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Amer v. Superior Court of California ex rel. County of Los Angeles, 334 U.S. 813, 68 S. Ct. 1069, 92 L. Ed. 1744, 1948 U.S. LEXIS 2232 (1948).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The petition for writs of certiorari is granted. In each case the order denying a petition for writ of prohibition is vacated and the case is remanded to the Su[814]*814preme Court of California in order to enable it to reconsider its ruling in the light of Shelley v. Kraemer and McGhee v. Sipes, 334 U. S. 1.

A. L. Wirin and Fred Okrand for petitioners. Harold L. Kennedy, Ray C. Eberhard and Elisabeth Eberhard Zeigler for respondent. Saburo Kido filed a brief for the Japanese American Citizens League, as amicus curiae, supporting the petition. Mr. Justice Reed, Mr. Justice Jackson, and Mr. Justice Rutledge took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The petition for writs of certiorari is granted. In each case the order denying a petition for writ of prohibition is vacated and the case is remanded to the Su[814]*814preme Court of California in order to enable it to reconsider its ruling in the light of Shelley v. Kraemer and McGhee v. Sipes, 334 U. S. 1.

A. L. Wirin and Fred Okrand for petitioners. Harold L. Kennedy, Ray C. Eberhard and Elisabeth Eberhard Zeigler for respondent. Saburo Kido filed a brief for the Japanese American Citizens League, as amicus curiae, supporting the petition. Mr. Justice Reed, Mr. Justice Jackson, and Mr. Justice Rutledge took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

334 U.S. 813, 68 S. Ct. 1069, 92 L. Ed. 1744, 1948 U.S. LEXIS 2232, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amer-v-superior-court-of-california-ex-rel-county-of-los-angeles-scotus-1948.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack