Amer v. Superior Court of California ex rel. County of Los Angeles

334 U.S. 813, 68 S. Ct. 1069, 92 L. Ed. 1744, 1948 U.S. LEXIS 2232
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 10, 1948·No. No. 429; No. 430·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The petition for writs of certiorari is granted. In each case the order denying a petition for writ of prohibition is vacated and the case is remanded to the Su[814]*814preme Court of California in order to enable it to reconsider its ruling in the light of Shelley v. Kraemer and McGhee v. Sipes, 334 U. S. 1.

A. L. Wirin and Fred Okrand for petitioners. Harold L. Kennedy, Ray C. Eberhard and Elisabeth Eberhard Zeigler for respondent. Saburo Kido filed a brief for the Japanese American Citizens League, as amicus curiae, supporting the petition. Mr. Justice Reed, Mr. Justice Jackson, and Mr. Justice Rutledge took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Amer v. Superior Court of California ex rel. County of Los Angeles, 334 U.S. 813, 68 S. Ct. 1069, 92 L. Ed. 1744, 1948 U.S. LEXIS 2232 (1948).

334 U.S. 813 (Amer v. Superior Court of California ex rel. County of Los Angeles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lawrence Ex Rel. Lawrence v. Chater
516 U.S. 163 (Supreme Court, 1996)