Ament v. Church of Annunciation of Elma

247 A.D.2d 843, 668 N.Y.S.2d 140, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1139
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 4, 1998·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendant’s motion for a change of venue pursuant to CPLR 510 (3). Defendant failed to “indicate in some detail” the testimony that the witnesses expected to be called would give and offered only vague assertions concerning the court calendars in the counties involved (Rodriguez v St. Paul’s Catholic Church, 162 AD2d 1017; see, Abbadonza v Brown, 186 AD2d 1011; Schapiro & Reich v Fuchsberg, 172 AD2d 1080). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Bergin, J. — Venue.)

Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Pine, Balio and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ament v. Church of Annunciation of Elma, 247 A.D.2d 843, 668 N.Y.S.2d 140, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1139 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

247 A.D.2d 843 (Ament v. Church of Annunciation of Elma) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stratton v. Dueppengiesser
281 A.D.2d 991 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Kessler v. State
256 A.D.2d 1154 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)