Amendola v. United States

Second Circuit

Amendola v. United States

26 F.2d 1015, 1928 U.S. App. LEXIS 3836

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedMay 21, 1928

DocketNo. 352

StatusPublished

This text of 26 F.2d 1015 (Amendola v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Amendola v. United States, 26 F.2d 1015, 1928 U.S. App. LEXIS 3836 (2d Cir. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This ease is a second trial on the indictment before us in Amendola v. U. S. (C. C. A.), 17 F.(2d) 529. The evidence was the same and the judge carefully left it to the jury to say where the sale took place. They must he understood to have held that Marinelli was Amendola’s agent. This was enough.

On confession of error the judgment is reversed on the first, second, and fourth counts. It is affirmed on the third.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This ease is a second trial on the indictment before us in Amendola v. U. S. (C. C. A.), 17 F.(2d) 529. The evidence was the same and the judge carefully left it to the jury to say where the sale took place. They must he understood to have held that Marinelli was Amendola’s agent. This was enough.

On confession of error the judgment is reversed on the first, second, and fourth counts. It is affirmed on the third.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 F.2d 1015, 1928 U.S. App. LEXIS 3836, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amendola-v-united-states-ca2-1928.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack