Amendola v. Ruggiero

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Amendola v. Ruggiero

149 N.Y.S. 907

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedNovember 19, 1914

StatusPublished

This text of 149 N.Y.S. 907 (Amendola v. Ruggiero) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Amendola v. Ruggiero, 149 N.Y.S. 907 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

SEABURY, J.

The plaintiff sued in replevin to recover a gold watch chain and a bracelet, alleged to be worth $40.50, or the thereof. The court below awarded judgment for the plaintiff in conversion for $40.50.

The judgment is modified, by striking out the provision awarding judgment in conversion, and so as to award the plaintiff the chattels sued for, or $40.50, the value thereof. As modified, the judgment is affirmed, without costs to either party. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SEABURY, J.

The plaintiff sued in replevin to recover a gold watch chain and a bracelet, alleged to be worth $40.50, or the thereof. The court below awarded judgment for the plaintiff in conversion for $40.50.

The judgment is modified, by striking out the provision awarding judgment in conversion, and so as to award the plaintiff the chattels sued for, or $40.50, the value thereof. As modified, the judgment is affirmed, without costs to either party. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

149 N.Y.S. 907, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amendola-v-ruggiero-nyappterm-1914.