Amendola v. Kendzia

17 A.D.3d 1109, 793 N.Y.S.2d 814, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4541
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Amendola v. Kendzia. Read the opinion of the Court — 17 A.D.3d 1105
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 29, 2005·No. Appeal No. 2·Published

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Richard C. Kloch Sr., A.J.), entered June 3, 2004. The order, among other things, dismissed counterclaims one through six as time-barred and, alternatively, dismissed counterclaims two and six as barred by the statute of frauds.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by denying the motion of counterclaim defendants Frank A. Amendola and Joseph E Bruno and the amended cross motion with respect to counterclaims one through four and reinstating those counterclaims and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Amendola v Kendzia (17 AD3d 1105 [2005]). Present—Scudder, J.P., Kehoe, Martoche, Smith and Hayes, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Amendola v. Kendzia, 17 A.D.3d 1109, 793 N.Y.S.2d 814, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4541 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

17 A.D.3d 1109 (Amendola v. Kendzia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Amendola v. Kendzia
17 A.D.3d 1105 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)