Amendments to the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar

795 So. 2d 1, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 79, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 319, 2001 WL 101623
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedFebruary 8, 2001
DocketNo. SC00-273
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 795 So. 2d 1 (Amendments to the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Amendments to the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar, 795 So. 2d 1, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 79, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 319, 2001 WL 101623 (Fla. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Florida Bar, with the authorization of the Board of Governors, petitions the Court to amend the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 15, Fla. Const.; R. Regulating Fla. Bar.

The proposed changes were published for comment in accordance with Rule Regulating the Florida Bar l-12.1(g). All but one comment filed addressed a proposed amendment which would have eliminated the deferral of the Basic Skills Course Requirement for government attorneys. After reviewing the comments opposing that amendment, the Bar withdrew the proposal in order to allow for discussion with the opponents to the amendment.

The remaining substantive proposed changes1 include amendment to or the creation of the following rules, bylaws and subchapters: rule 1-3.2 (Membership Classifications); rule 1-3.5 (Retirement); rule 1-3.7 (Reinstatement to Membership); new rule 1-3 .10 (Appearances by Non Florida Lawyers); rule 1-7.3 (Membership Fees); subchapter 2-1 (Seal, Emblems, and Publicity Symbols); bylaw 2-1.2 (Publicity Symbol); bylaw 2-1.3 (Usage); bylaw 2-7.3 (Creation of Sections and Divisions); rule 3-5.1 (Types of Discipline; Generally); rule 3-7.1 (Confidentiality); rule 3-7.4 (Grievance Committee Procedures); rule 3-7.10 (Reinstatement and Readmission Procedures); rule 3-7.11 (General Rule of Procedure); rule 3-7.12 (Disciplinary Resignation from The Florida Bar); rule 4-1.5 (Fees for Legal Services); rule 4-8.3 (Reporting Professional Misconduct); rule 4-8.4 (Misconduct); rule 6-3.2 (Certification Committees); new rule 6-3.7 (Emeritus Specialist Status); rule 6-3.10 (Fees); rule 6-10.3 (Minimum Continuing Legal Education Standards); rule 6-12.1 (Basic Skills Course Requirement); rule 6-12.2 (Administration); rule 6-12.3 (Basic Skills Course Standards); new rule 6-12.3 (Requirement); new rule 6-12.4 [2]*2(Deferment and Exemption); rule 6-12.4 (Noncompliance and Sanctions); rule 10-4.1 (UPL Circuit Committees; Generally); rule 10-7.2 (Proceedings for Indirect Criminal Contempt); and rule 10-9.1 (Procedures for Issuance of Advisory Opinions on UPL).

After reviewing the proposals, we asked the Bar to file a supplemental petition addressing two matters of concern to the Court; that is, the adoption or amendment of rules 1-3.10 and 3-4.1. Specifically, we asked the Bar to address how the conduct of non-Florida lawyers engaged in mediation or arbitration within this state can be regulated if such lawyers are not required to be admitted to The Florida Bar under rule 1-3.10. See Amendments to Rules Regulating Fla. Bar, No. SC00-273 (Fla. order filed Sept. 1, 2000). We also asked the Bar to address the advisability of amending rule 3-7.12 to include a statement that disciplinary resignation is equivalent to disbarment. In its supplemental petition, the Bar proposed further amendment to rule 3-5.1 (Types of Discipline; Generally). After considering the Bar’s original and supplemental petitions as well as the comment filed concerning rule 1-3.10, we reach the following conclusions.

We adopt proposed new rule 1-3.10, Appearances by Non Florida Lawyers, which addresses practice by non-Florida lawyers. This rule contains provisions formerly found in subdivision (a) of rule 1-3.2, plus new provisions not previously contained in that rule. The new rule is similar to recently adopted Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.061, Foreign Attorneys. See Amendments to Fla. Rules of Jud. Admin., 780 So.2d 819 (Fla.2000). Consistent with our modifications to proposed rule 2:061, id at 826, we have modified rule 1-3.10 to remove references to the term “pro hac vice.” Subdivision (a)(2) of rule 1-3.10 prohibits “a general practice before Florida courts” which is considered “more than 3 appearances within a 365-day period in separate and unrelated representations.” Subdivisions (a)(3) and (a)(4) specifically prohibit appearances by inactive, suspended, or former members of The Florida Bar, or those sanctioned during prior appearance under the rule. Subdivision (b) prescribes the content of a verified motion filed under the rule. In response to the comment filed concerning this rule suggesting clarification of subdivision (b)(4), we have added language to that subdivision which clarifies that the only requests to be admitted to practice which must be disclosed in the verified motion are those made to a Florida court.

We reject the Bar’s recommendation to amend rule 3-4.1 at this time. Under this proposed amendment, non-Florida lawyers would be placed on the same footing as a member of The Florida Bar by being subject to the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar, including the Rules of Professional Conduct, for any unethical conduct that might occur during the course of the representation. Because it is not clear how the conduct of non-Florida lawyers who are appearing in mediation or arbitration in Florida without being admitted under the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar can be regulated by this Court, we are remanding this matter to the Bar for further consideration.

However, we adopt the Bar’s proposed amendments to rules 3-7.12 and 3-5.1(j) so as to include the following language:

Disciplinary resignation is the functional equivalent of disbarment in that both sanctions terminate the license and privilege to practice law and both require readmission to practice under the Rules of the Supreme Court Relating to Admissions to the Bar.

These amendments are in addition to other amendments to the above rules which were [3]*3recommended by the Bar in its original petition. The Bar’s recommendations from its original petition are reflected below in the appendix.

Accordingly, we amend the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar as provided in the appendix. New language is indicated by underscoring; deletions are indicated by struck-through type. The amendments shall take effect upon the filing of this opinion.

It is so ordered.

WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ„ concur.

APPENDIX

RULE 1-3.2 MEMBERSHIP CLASSIFICATIONS

(a) Members in Good Standing. Members of The Florida Bar in good standing shall mean only those persons licensed to practice law in Florida who have paid annual membership fees or dues for the current year and who are not retired, resigned, delinquent, inactive, or suspended members. A practicing attorney of another state, in good standing, who has professional business in a court of record of this state may, upon motion, be permitted to practice for the purpose of such business upon sueh-conditions as-the court dee-ms-appropriate-under the circumstances of the case..

(b) Conditionally Admitted Members. The Supreme Court of Florida may admit a person with a prior history of drug, alcohol, or psychological problems to membership in The Florida Bar and impose conditions of probation as the court deems appropriate upon that member. The period of probation shall be no longer than 3 5 years, or for such indefinite period of time as the court may deem appropriate by conditions in its order. The conditions may include, but not be limited to, participation in a rehabilitation program, periodic blood and urine analysis, periodic psychological examinations, or supervision by another member of The Florida Bar. The probation shall be monitored by The Florida Bar and the costs thereof shall be paid by the member on probation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Amendments to the Florida Rules of Judicial Administration
780 So. 2d 819 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
795 So. 2d 1, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 79, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 319, 2001 WL 101623, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amendments-to-the-rules-regulating-the-florida-bar-fla-2001.