Amendments to Rules Regulating the Florida Bar

692 So. 2d 181, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 216, 1997 Fla. LEXIS 563, 1997 WL 196798
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedApril 24, 1997
DocketNo. 89552
StatusPublished

This text of 692 So. 2d 181 (Amendments to Rules Regulating the Florida Bar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Amendments to Rules Regulating the Florida Bar, 692 So. 2d 181, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 216, 1997 Fla. LEXIS 563, 1997 WL 196798 (Fla. 1997).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to rule 1 — 12.1(f) of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar, fifty or more active members of The Florida Bar, on behalf of the Florida Bar Foundation (Foundation), petition the Court to amend rule 5-1.1(e) of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar. We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 15 of the Florida Constitution.

Rule 5-l.l(e) deals with the Interest on Trust Accounts (IOTA) Program and requires that all nominal or short-term funds [182]*182which are placed in trust with a member of The Florida Bar practicing within the state of Florida be deposited into an interest-bearing trust account for the benefit of the Foundation. Under the IOTA program, the interest generated on trust accounts is used to fund programs which are designed to improve the administration of justice or to expand the delivery of legal services to the poor. In re Interest on Trust Accounts, 538 So.2d 448, 450 (Fla.1989).

The petition was authorized by the Board of Directors of the Foundation as the administrator of the IOTA Program. The proposed amendments were also authorized by the Board of Governors of The Florida Bar at its November 1, 1996, meeting. Notice of the filing of this petition and a copy of the proposed amendments were published in the November 15,1996, issue of The Florida Bar News. Comments or objections to the proposed amendments were due by January 13, 1997. The Bar filed a response asking the Court to approve the petition. Bar member Elsie C. Turner filed a response in opposition to the amendments and also filed a brief in opposition on her own behalf and on behalf of several financial management firms.

The proposed amendment to rule 5 — 1.1(e) would implement a voluntary IOTA sweep account1 program in order to increase annual IOTA revenue. The Foundation would recruit attorneys and law firms with high average balance IOTA accounts (in excess of $30,000) in eligible financial institutions to establish sweep accounts utilizing daily bank repurchase agreements as the higher yield investment.2 Only those Florida financial institutions offering repurchase agreements that are fully collateralized by direct obligations of the United States government or its agencies would be eligible to participate in the program. According to the Foundation, such a voluntary sweep program has the potential of increasing annual IOTA revenue by $7.5 million.

Turner argues that the proposed amendment “unreasonably restricts the investment vehicle” into which the IOTA funds may be swept. Turner requests that the Court suspend any action on the proposed amendment until the Foundation investigates alternative investment vehicles such as government-portfolio money market funds.

After reviewing the petition and other materials filed in support of and opposition to the proposed amendment and hearing oral argument from the parties, we conclude that the rule should be amended to permit voluntary IOTA sweep accounts at eligible financial institutions through the use of daily bank repurchase agreements.3 However, as suggested by the Foundation at oral argument, we limit the use of such repurchase agreement instruments for the IOTA sweep accounts to those financial institutions that carry the two highest levels of capitalization ratings from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

Accordingly, we approve the petition and amend rule 5-l.l(e) as reflected in the Appendix to this opinion. Underscoring indicates new language; strike-through type indicates deletions. The amendments to this rule shall become effective upon the filing of this opinion. Because the rule amendment relating to the capitalization ratings of eligible financial institutions is being adopted by the Court without prior notice to interested parties, we hereby direct that all interested parties may submit comments regarding this amendment within thirty days from the date [183]*183of this opinion. Consideration of comments, however, will not alter the effective date of the amendments.

It is so ordered.

KOGAN, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, GRIMES, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.

APPENDIX

RULE 5-1.1 TRUST ACCOUNTS

[No change to (a) through (d).]

(e) Interest on Trust Accounts (IOTA) Program.

(1) Definitions. As used in rule 5-l.l(e) herein, the term:

(A) “nominal or short term” describes funds of a client or third person that, pursuant to rule 5-l.l(e)(7) subdivision (7), below, the lawyer has determined cannot practicably be placed at interest for the benefit of the client or third person;

(B) “Foundation” means The Florida Bar Foundation, Inc.;

(C) “IOTA account” means a trust account described in rule 5-l.-l(e) subdivision (2), below.

(D) “Daily Financial Institution Repurchase Agreement” means an overnight investment of IOTA Funds described in subdivision (4), below, in a financial institution eligible to enter into a Daily Repurchase Agreement described in subdivision (3), below.

(2) Required Participation. All nominal or short-term funds belonging to clients or third persons that are placed in trust with any member of The Florida Bar practicing from an office or other business location within the state of Florida shall be deposited into one or more interest-bearing trust checking accounts in an eligible financial institution for the benefit of the Foundation, except as provided in rule 4-1.15 with respect to funds maintained other than in a bank account, or as provided in rule 5-1.2(a). Only trust funds that are nominal or short term shall be deposited into an IOTA account. The member shall certify annually, in writing, that the member is in compliance with, or is exempt from, the provisions of rule 5-l.l(d) this rule.

(3) Eligible Financial Institutions. An IOTA account shall be established with any bank or savings and loan association authorized by federal or state laws to do business in Florida and insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation, or any successor insurance corporation(s) established by federal or state laws. The funds in each IOTA account covered by this rule shall be subject to withdrawal upon request and without delay. A daily financial institution repurchase agreement, described in subdivision (1)(D), above, may be established only with an eligible financial institution which is deemed to be “well capitalized” or “adequately capitalized” as defined in applicable federal statutes and regulations.

(4) Interest Rates. The rate of interest on any-I-Q-TA account funds covered by this rule shall not be less than the rate paid by the financial institution to on funds of non-IOTA account depositors. Higher rates offered by the financial institution to customers whose deposits exceed certain time or quantity mín-imums may be obtained by a lawyer or law firm for IOTA accounts on some or all of the deposited funds through use of eligible financial institution daily repurchase agreements in which the underlying security consists solely of direct obligations of the United States Government or agency thereof so long as there is no impairment of the right to immediately withdraw or transfer principal.

(5) Remittance Instructions. Lawyers or law firms shall direct the financial institution:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Interest on Trust Accounts
538 So. 2d 448 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
692 So. 2d 181, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 216, 1997 Fla. LEXIS 563, 1997 WL 196798, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amendments-to-rules-regulating-the-florida-bar-fla-1997.