Amendments to Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure

827 So. 2d 219, 27 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 747, 2002 Fla. LEXIS 1844, 2002 WL 2018714
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided September 5, 2002·No. No. SC02-117·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have for consideration the biennial report of The Florida Bar Juvenile Court Rules Committee (the Committee) proposing rules changes in accordance with Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.180(c). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 2(a), Fla. Const. Pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.130(c)(3), the proposed changes were submitted to the Board of Governors of The Florida Bar for its approval, and the Board approved the changes unanimously.

The Committee has proposed amendments to Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure 8.030, 8.031, 8.085, 8.110, 8.185, 8.201, 8.210, 8.225, 8.245, 8.255, 8.265, 8.275, 8.345, 8.525, and 8.635, and Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure Forms 8.959, 8.960, 8.967, and 8.979. Further, the Committee has proposed new Form 8.929, Detention Order. The proposed changes were published for comment, and comments were received regarding rule 8.255 and new form 8.929. Oral argument was held in this case on May 10, 2002.

After reviewing the Committee’s proposals and the comments received and hearing oral argument, we adopt the Committee’s proposed changes; however, we make revisions to rule 8.255 and new form 8.929 as indicated below.

RULE 8.255

The Committee proposed that rule 8.255, General Provisions for Hearings, be amended to prohibit both general and special masters from conducting specific dependency hearings — namely, shelter hearings, contested dependency adjudicatory hearings, disposition hearings, and contested termination of parental rights adjudicatory hearings. The Committee farther proposed that the rule be amended to specify that the enumerated hearings shah be conducted by a judge. Finally, the Committee proposed to amend rule 8.255 to reiterate the requirement that all parties must consent to referral to a general or special master.

Multiple comments were received in opposition to amending rule 8.255 to prohibit masters from hearing certain types of cases. Some commentators claim that the amendment will overly restrict the duties of masters and will harm the administration of justice. Other commentators express the need for the roles of masters to be flexible so that they may assist the judicial circuits in whatever manner their services are needed. Finally, some commentators argue that any decision to change the role of masters should be made in conjunction with the Court’s ultimate resolution of the Revision 7/Article V funding issues that are currently being consid[221] ered by this Court.1

We conclude that the ultimate determination of the role of masters in dependency proceedings should be resolved in the larger context of the Revision 7 implementation. As we have stated, Florida’s children are our greatest resource, and adequate funding of juvenile judicial proceedings is of paramount importance:

Florida’s oft-repeated pledge that “our children come first” cannot ring hollow in — of all places — our halls of justice. Judges, prosecutors, public defenders and others serving in the juvenile system cannot hope to make a difference in the life of a single troubled child if they must contend with staggering caseloads made worse by the maldistribution of judicial resources.

See Amendment to Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.100(a), 753 So.2d 541, 545 (Fla.1999). We hesitate to take actions that could have a significant impact on the Florida judicial system’s ability to provide timely and efficient adjudication of juvenile dependency proceedings without considering the “big picture” of how funding for our judicial system will be allocated under the Revision 7 implementation. Therefore, we decline to limit the role of masters in juvenile proceedings by a rule of procedure until this Court has had time to consider the impact — practically and financially — that Revision 7 will have on the administration of juvenile justice.2

Nevertheless, the Committee has pointed out that the Florida Statutes require some of the proceedings cited in rule 8.255(i) to be conducted by “a judge without a jury.” See §§ 39.507 (dependency adjudicatory hearings), 39.809 (termination of parental rights adjudicatory hearings), Fla. Stat. (2001). Accordingly, although we do not approve the amendment prohibiting masters, from hearing specific types of proceedings, we amend rule 8.255 to state that “general and special masters may be appointed to hear issues involved in proceedings under this part, except as otherwise prohibited by law.” (Emphasis added.)

On the other hand, we fully agree with and approve the Committee’s proposal to amend rule 8.255 to reiterate the requirement that all parties must consent to re[222] ferral to a general or special master. At oral argument we were advised that there is no formal procedure in place for obtaining the parties’ consent to refer a dependency or termination of parental rights matter to a master.

In the past, this Court has removed prohibitions on masters hearing certain types of proceedings, but specifically has noted the requirement that all parties consent to the referral. See, e.g., In re Family Law Rules of Procedure, 663 So.2d 1049, 1051 (Fla.1995) (removing prohibition on general masters from hearing contempt proceedings, but noting that “under the rules governing masters, no matter shall be heard by a general master without the consent of all parties”). For this reason, we agree with and approve the Committee’s addition of language to rule 8.255(i) that likewise explicitly requires consent of all parties. Further, because we believe that a formal procedure for obtaining the parties’ consent to referral to a master in dependency and termination of parental rights proceedings is necessary, and because other rules of court currently have such a procedure in place, see, e.g., Fla. Fam. L.R.P. 12.490(b), we refer this matter back to the Committee for consideration of a rule of juvenile procedure for obtaining the parties’ consent.

FORM 8.929

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Amendments to Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure, 827 So. 2d 219, 27 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 747, 2002 Fla. LEXIS 1844, 2002 WL 2018714 (Fla. 2002).

827 So. 2d 219 (Amendments to Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Amendments to the Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure
894 So. 2d 875 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2005)