Amendments to Fl. Bar-Rules 3-5.2 and 3-7.2

933 So. 2d 498, 2006 WL 1766788
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJune 29, 2006
DocketSC05-1684
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 933 So. 2d 498 (Amendments to Fl. Bar-Rules 3-5.2 and 3-7.2) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Amendments to Fl. Bar-Rules 3-5.2 and 3-7.2, 933 So. 2d 498, 2006 WL 1766788 (Fla. 2006).

Opinion

933 So.2d 498 (2006)

In re AMENDMENTS TO THE RULES REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR—RULES 3-5.2 AND 3-7.2.

No. SC05-1684.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 29, 2006.

Murray B. Silverstein, Chair, Disciplinary Procedure Committee, St. Petersburg, FL, Alan B. Bookman, President, Henry M. Coxe, III, President-elect, John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director, and John Anthony Boggs, Director, Legal Division-Lawyer Regulation, The Florida Bar, Tallahassee, FL, for Petitioner.

William D. Matthewman of Seiden, Alder and Matthewman, P.A., Boca Raton, FL, responding with comments.

PER CURIAM.

The Florida Bar petitions this Court to consider its proposed amendments to the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar. The petition is in response to the Court's request that the Bar consider several issues regarding the operation of rules 3-5.2 (emergency suspension and probation) and 3-7.2 (procedures upon criminal or professional misconduct). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, 15, Fla. Const.

The Bar submitted the proposals to the Board of Governors of The Florida Bar for its recommendation. The Board approved the proposals. The proposals were published for comment in the August 1, 2005, edition of The Florida Bar News. In that publication, the Bar instructed interested parties to file any comments directly with the Court. Thereafter, the Bar filed the proposals with the Court.

In response to the publication notice, one comment was filed with the Court. After considering the comment and holding oral argument on June 7, 2006, the Court adopts the Bar's proposals, modified as follows.

First, the proposal for rule 3-7.2 (procedures upon criminal or professional misconduct) would have deleted language stating the well-established principle that a person cannot return to the practice of law in Florida until his or her civil rights have been restored. The Court modifies the proposal to retain this principle in the rule.

Second, the proposal for rule 3-7.2(e) would require bar members to report determinations or judgments of guilt for any criminal offense. The commenter suggested that this new requirement should specify a date, clarifying the entered determinations or judgments that bar members must report. Otherwise, bar members might conclude that they are required to report past determinations or judgments of guilt which were entered before the effective date of the instant proposals. Thus, the Court modifies the proposal to clarify that bar members shall notify the executive director of The Florida Bar of determinations or judgments entered on or after August 1, 2006.

Accordingly, the Court adopts the amendments to the Rules Regulating the *499 Florida Bar as set forth in the appendix to this opinion. Deletions are indicated by struck-through type, and new language is indicated by underscoring. The amendments shall become effective on August 1, 2006, at 12:01 a.m.

It is so ordered.

PARIENTE, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.

APPENDIX

RULE 3-5.2 EMERGENCY SUSPENSION AND INTERIM PROBATION

(a) Initial—Petition for Emergency Suspension. On petition of The Florida Bar, authorized by its president, presidentelect, or executive director, supported by 1 or more affidavits demonstrating facts personally known to the affiants that, if unrebutted, would establish clearly and convincingly that an attorney appears to be causing great public harm, the Supreme Court of Florida may issue an order imposing emergency conditions of probation on said attorney or suspending said attorney on an emergency basis.

(b) Petition for Interim Probation. On petition of The Florida Bar, authorized by its president, president-elect, or executive director, supported by 1 or more affidavits demonstrating facts personally known to the affiants that, if unrebutted, would establish clearly and convincingly that conditions or restrictions on an attorneys privilege to practice law in Florida are necessary for protection of the public, the Supreme Court of Florida may issue an order placing said attorney on interim probation, the conditions of which shall be as provided in rule 3-5.1(c).

(bc) Trust Accounts. Any order of emergency suspension or probation that restricts the attorney in maintaining a trust account shall, when served on any bank or other financial institution maintaining an account against which said attorney may make withdrawals, serve as an injunction to prevent said bank or financial institution from making further payment from such account or accounts on any obligation except in accordance with restrictions imposed by the court.

(cd) New Cases and Existing Clients. Any order of emergency suspension issued under this rule shall immediately preclude the attorney from accepting any new cases and unless otherwise ordered permit the attorney to continue to represent existing clients for only the first 30 days after issuance of such emergency order. Any fees paid to the suspended attorney during the 30-day period shall be deposited in a trust account from which withdrawals may be made only in accordance with restrictions imposed by the court.

(de) Filing of Formal Complaints. The Florida Bar shall file a formal complaint within 60 days of the emergency order and proceed to trial of the underlying issues, without the necessity of a finding of probable cause by either a grievance committee or the board of governors.

(ef) Motions for Dissolution.

(1) The attorney may move at any time for dissolution or amendment of an emergency order by motion filed with the Supreme Court of Florida, a copy of which will be served on bar counsel. Such motion shall operate as anot stay of any other proceedings and applicable time limitations in the case and, unless the motion fails to state good cause or is procedurally barred as an invalid successive motion, shall immediately be assigned to a referee designated by the chief justice. The filing of such motion shall not stay the operation of an order of emergency suspension or interim probation entered under this rule.

*500 (2) The referee shall hear such motion within 7 days of assignment, or a shorter time if practicable, and submit a report and recommendation to the Supreme Court of Florida within 7 days of the date of the hearing, or a shorter time if practicable. The referee shall recommend dissolution or amendment, whichever is appropriate, to the extent that bar counsel cannot demonstrate a likelihood of prevailing on the merits on any element of the underlying complaint.

(3) Successive motions for dissolution shall be summarily dismissed by the supreme court to the extent that they raise issues that were or with due diligence could have been raised in a prior motion.

(4) Upon receipt of the referees recommended order on the motion for dissolution or amendment, the supreme court shall review and act upon the referees findings and recommendations. If the court continues the order of emergency suspension or probation in any manner, The Florida Bar shall file a formal complaint, if one has not yet been filed, within 60 days of the continuance and proceed to trial of the underlying issues, without the necessity of a finding of probable cause by either a grievance committee or the board of governors. A continuance of the emergency suspension or probation dissolves the stay of other proceedings.

(fg) Hearings on Formal Complaints.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Amendments to the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar—Rule 3-7.2
954 So. 2d 15 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
933 So. 2d 498, 2006 WL 1766788, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amendments-to-fl-bar-rules-3-52-and-3-72-fla-2006.