Amendment to Rules Regulating the Florida Bar

797 So. 2d 551, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 409, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 1174, 2001 WL 660688
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJune 14, 2001
DocketNo. SC01-851
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 797 So. 2d 551 (Amendment to Rules Regulating the Florida Bar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Amendment to Rules Regulating the Florida Bar, 797 So. 2d 551, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 409, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 1174, 2001 WL 660688 (Fla. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to rule 1-12.1(f) of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar, fifty or more active members of The Florida Bar, on behalf of the Florida Bar Foundation (“Foundation”), petition the Court to amend rule 5-l.l(e) of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 15, Fla. Const.

Rule 5-l.l(e) deals with the Interest on Trust Accounts (“IOTA”) Program and requires that all nominal or short term funds that are placed in trust with a member of The Florida Bar practicing within the state of Florida be deposited into an interest-bearing trust account for the benefit of the Foundation. Under the IOTA program, the interest generated on trust accounts is used to fund programs that are designed to improve the administration of justice or to expand the delivery of legal services to the poor.

The petition was authorized by the Board of Directors of the Foundation as the administrator of the IOTA Program. The Foundation states that the purpose of the amendment is to increase IOTA revenues by broadening the types of institutions that may participate in IOTA. The current rule permits only banks or authorized savings and loan associations to participate in IOTA, see R. Regulating Fla. Bar 5-1.1(e)(3). Under the proposed amendment, investment companies will be allowed to qualify as eligible institutions in which IOTA accounts may be established.

The amendment further allows the use of government money market funds for IOTA funds; however, only money market funds that are registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and are comprised solely of United States Government Securities, are proposed for use in the IOTA program. Further, only those money market funds with a total asset value of at least $250 million would be eligible to participate.

Finally, the amendment defines institutions that are eligible to hold IOTA accounts as only those institutions which pay IOTA account depositors the highest interest rate or dividend generally available at their own institution to non-IOTA customers when IOTA accounts meet the same minimum balance or other requirements. According to the Foundation, the purpose of this portion of the amendment is to secure fair treatment of IOTA accounts so that financial institutions do not discriminate against IOTA accounts when the allowable interest rate is calculated. Essentially, all the Foundation asks is that IOTA accounts be placed in parity with non-IOTA accounts within each financial institution. The Foundation recognizes, however, that the interest rates offered are not based on account balance alone.

If the amendment is approved, the Foundation proposes that it should be charged with the responsibility of determining the initial and continuing eligibility of banks, savings and loan associations and investment companies to hold IOTA accounts. We conclude that such a charge is consistent with the Foundation’s charter. See Fla. Bar Found. Charter, art. 2.5(c) (stating that Foundation serves as manag[553]*553er and administrator of the IOTA program).

The Foundation requests that the proposed amendment be made effective thirty days after this Court’s order. However, the Foundation asks that those institutions currently holding IOTA accounts be provided a reasonable period of time during which to comply with the new eligibility requirements. The Foundation suggests a six-month time period for compliance.

The proposed amendments were published for comment in the February 15, 2001, edition of The Florida Bar News and modifications were published in the April 15, 2001, edition of the News. The comments received were provided to the Board of Governors of The Florida Bar, which approved the amendments unanimously on March 30, 2001. After the Foundation filed its petition with this Court, three further comments were filed, including one from the Florida Bankers Association (“FBA”).

After reviewing the petition and comments regarding the proposed amendment and hearing oral argument from the parties, we conclude that rule 5-l.l(e) should be amended. Not only does this amendment have the unanimous endorsement of the Board of Governors, but nearly all of the comments received have been overwhelmingly in favor of the purpose behind the amendments. However, in light of the concerns expressed in the comment of the FBA that the rule be clarified to reflect the intent that there be interest parity between IOTA accounts and non-IOTA accounts held in the same financial institution, we adopt the FBA’s suggested revisions to proposed subdivision (e)(5)(A) and add proposed subdivision (B) to the rule. The Foundation has indicated it has no objection to the FBA’s suggested revisions. We thank the FBA for its assistance, cooperation and constructive suggestions.

Accordingly, we approve the petition and amend rule 5-l.l(e) as reflected in the Appendix to this opinion.1 Underscoring indicates new language; strike-through type indicates deletions. In accord with the Foundation’s request, the proposed amendment shall be made effective thirty days after the date of this opinion. However, those institutions currently holding IOTA accounts that elect to participate in IOTA under the new rule shall be provided six months to comply with the new eligibility requirements. The Foundation shall be charged with the responsibility of determining the initial and continuing eligibility of banks, savings and loan associations and investment companies to hold IOTA accounts in accordance with the criteria set forth in the rule.

It is so ordered.

WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

APPENDIX

Rule 5-1.1. Trust Accounts

(e) Interest on Trust Accounts (IOTA) Program.

(1) Definitions. As used herein, the term:

(A) “nominal or short term” describes funds of a client or third person that, pursuant to subdivision (73), below, the lawyer has determined cannot practicably be placed at interest invested for the benefit of the client or third person;

[554]*554(B) “Foundation” means The Florida Bar Foundation, Inc.;

(C) “IOTA account” means an interest or dividend-bearing trust account described in-■■subdiv-ision-(-g-), below bene-fitting The Florida Bar Foundation established in an eligible institution for the deposit of nominal or short-term funds of clients or third persons;

(D) ^Dally — F-inancial Institution Repurchase^Agreement” means an overnight investment -of-IOTA — funds described — in subdivision (4), below, in a financial institution eligible to enter into' a Daily Repurchase Agreement described-in-subdivision (g),.below— (g-)“Eligible Financial Institutions” An IOTA Account shall be^ established-wife means any bank or savings and loan association authorized by federal or state laws to do business in Florida and insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation, or any successor insurance corporation(s) established by federal or state laws, or any open-end investment company registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission and authorized by federal or state laws to do business in Florida, all of which must meet the requirements set out in subdivision (5), below. The funds-covered by this rule shall be- subject -to ■ -withdrawal — upon—request and without delay.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Riser v. Hartford Ins. Co.
971 So. 2d 878 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
797 So. 2d 551, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 409, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 1174, 2001 WL 660688, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amendment-to-rules-regulating-the-florida-bar-fla-2001.