Amend. to Fla. Rules of Workers'comp.

664 So. 2d 945, 1995 WL 656744
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedNovember 9, 1995
Docket86035
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 664 So. 2d 945 (Amend. to Fla. Rules of Workers'comp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Amend. to Fla. Rules of Workers'comp., 664 So. 2d 945, 1995 WL 656744 (Fla. 1995).

Opinion

664 So.2d 945 (1995)

In re AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROCEDURE.

No. 86035.

Supreme Court of Florida.

November 9, 1995.

John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director, The Florida Bar, Tallahassee, for Petitioner.

Frederic M. Schott, pro se, Orlando; Honorable John J. Lazzara, Judge of Compensation Claims, Florida Department of Labor and Employment Security, Tallahassee; Dennis M. Usdan, pro se, Plantation; Annemarie Craft, Counsel for Special Disability Trust Fund, Florida Department of Labor and Employment Security, Tallahassee; Clark W. Berry, pro se, of the Law Offices of Vernis & Bowling of Southwest Florida, P.A., Fort Myers; and Honorable E. Earle Zehmer, Chief Judge, First District Court of Appeal, Tallahassee, Responding.

WELLS, Justice.

This matter is before the Court upon a report filed by the Workers' Compensation Rules Committee of The Florida Bar recommending emergency amendments to the Florida Rules of Workers' Compensation Procedure. We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 2(a) of the Florida Constitution. Upon the request of the chief judge of the First District Court of Appeal, we have considered those portions of the proposed amendments relating to appellate proceedings, to which there is no opposition, and we approve them.

Accordingly, part B of the Florida Rules of Workers' Compensation Procedure is amended and adopted as reflected in the appendix to this opinion. New language is indicated by underscoring; deleted language is indicated by overstriking. Committee comments are included for explanation and guidance only and are not adopted as an official part of the rules. These amendments shall take effect upon the release of this opinion.

No motion for rehearing shall be entertained.

It is so ordered.

GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, KOGAN, HARDING and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.

APPENDIX

PART BII. APPELLATE PROCEEDINGS

RULE 4.156. APPLICABILITY. Appellate review proceedings in workers' compensation cases shall be governed by the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure (civil) except as otherwise provided by these rules.

Committee Notes

1995 Amendment. This is a new rule clarifying that the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, with the exception of the rules set forth below, govern workers' compensation *946 appellate review. With this clarification certain rules have been completely deleted because they were unnecessary or duplicative of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. The rules deleted in their entirety and their appellate rules counterparts [in brackets] are Rules 4.180(e) [9.200(f)(2)], 4.225 [9.210(g)], 4.240 [9.320], 4.250 [9.330], 4.255 [9.331], 4.260 [9.340]. Rule 4.270 has now been rewritten as Rule 4.156.

RULE 4.160. APPELLATE JURISDICTION

(a) Jurisdiction of District Court.

(1) The district court may shall review by appeal any final order of a judge. and any nonfinal order of a judge that adjudicates:

(A) jurisdiction;

(B) venue; or

(C) compensability, provided that the order expressly finds an injury occurred within the scope and course of employment and that the claimant is entitled to receive causally related benefits in some amount, and provided further that the judge certifies in the order that determination of the exact nature and amount of benefits due to the claimant will require substantial expense and time.

(2) Jurisdiction of the district court shall be invoked by filing a notice of appeal under these rules within 30 days of the date the order to be reviewed is mailed by the judge to the parties, which date shall be the date of rendition.

(b) Discretionary Jurisdiction: The district court also may review any nonfinal order of a judge that adjudicates the following:

(1) Jurisdiction.

(2) Venue.

(3) Compensability of accidents or occupational diseases.

(4) Insurance coverage.

(5) Discovery matters when it appears the judge's order will cause a party irreparable harm and there is no adequate remedy at law to rectify such harm.

(c) Commencement. Jurisdiction of the district court shall be invoked by filing a notice of appeal under these rules within 30 days after the order to be reviewed is mailed to the parties.

(d) Record: Review. Unless ordered by the district court, the record on appeal of a nonfinal order shall be limited to those items set forth in rule 4.180(b).

(e) Briefs: Discretionary Review. The appellant's initial brief in an appeal of a nonfinal order, accompanied by an appendix as prescribed by rule 4.180(b)(2), shall be filed with the notice of appeal.

(fb) Jurisdiction of Judge Divested. Except as provided for in these rules, the judge shall have no further jurisdiction over issues raised in the appeal.

(gc) Jurisdiction of Judge: Substantive Issues Not Affected. While on appeal, tThe judge retains jurisdiction to decide the issues that have not been adjudicated and are not the subject of pending appellate review.

(hd) Jurisdiction of Judge: Procedural Matters. During the pendency of an appeal, the judge retains jurisdiction to:

(1) supervise the preparation of the record on appeal, including the costs of preparation;

(2) extend thegrant extensions of time for filing the record up to 30 days as allowed under these rules. Any further extensions may be granted by the district court;

(3) correct clerical errors at any time before the record is filed with the district court; and

(4) determine if appellate issues have been abandoned.at any time before the record on appeal is filed with the district court under rule 4.180(i), approve settlements or correct clerical errors in the order appealed.

(ie) Discretionary Divestment Relinquishment of Jurisdiction by District Court. In cases in which the judge no longer has jurisdiction, the district court may relinquish jurisdiction to permit the judge to proceed to adjudicate specifically designated matters.

(jf) Discretionary Divestment to Consider Settlement.

(1) Investigation. On stipulation of the parties, the judge may investigate the efficacy *947 of a proposed settlement, either in whole or in part, of issues on appeal.

(1) Remand by District CourtIf after the record on appeal is filed, settlement is reached, the parties shall file a On joint motion of the parties stating that a settlement has been reached and requesting relinquishment of jurisdiction to the judge for approval of the settlement by the judge., The district court may remand the cause relinquish jurisdiction to the judge for a specified period for entry of an appropriate order. In the event the division has advanced the costs of preparing the record on appeal or the filing fee, a copy of the joint motion shall be furnished to the division by the appellant.

(2) On or before the date specified in the order relinquishing jurisdiction, the parties shall file a joint notice of disposition of the settlement with a conformed copy of any order entered on the settlement.

(3) Costs. Any order approving a settlement shall provide where appropriate for the assessment and recovery of appellate costs including any costs incurred by the division for insolvent appellants.

(k) Concurrent Jurisdiction. Before the record on appeal is transmitted to the district court, the judge and the district court have concurrent jurisdiction to enter orders on procedural matters.

(g) Other Review. Nothing in this rule shall be interpreted as precluding other original proceedings in the district court as provided in the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Amendments to the Florida Rules of Workers' Compensation Procedure
891 So. 2d 474 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2004)
Amend. to Fla. Rules of Appellate Proc.
696 So. 2d 1103 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1996)
Consultants & Designers v. Brown
677 So. 2d 915 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Emro Marketing v. Schwier
670 So. 2d 1141 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
North Alabama Transportation v. Steele
664 So. 2d 318 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
664 So. 2d 945, 1995 WL 656744, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amend-to-fla-rules-of-workerscomp-fla-1995.