Amelia Corp. v. Leatherman, as Clerk

132 So. 837, 101 Fla. 1184
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided March 17, 1931·Published

Opinion

*1185 Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that 'there is' no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed. See Ridgeway v. Reese, 100 Fla. ...., 131 So. 135; Ridgeway v. Peacock, 100 Fla. ...., 131 So. 140, Poekel v. Dowling filed at this term.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P.J., Terrell, J., and Hutchison, Circuit Judge, concur. Buford, C. J., and Brown, J., concur in the opinion and judgment. Ellis, J., dissents.. Davis, J., disqualified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Amelia Corp. v. Leatherman, as Clerk, 132 So. 837, 101 Fla. 1184 (Fla. 1931).

132 So. 837 (Amelia Corp. v. Leatherman, as Clerk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Townsend Burns Ridgeway v. Peacock
131 So. 140 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1930)