Amelia Ales Barnett v. William B. Barnett

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedFebruary 1, 2023
Docket2022CW1253
StatusUnknown

This text of Amelia Ales Barnett v. William B. Barnett (Amelia Ales Barnett v. William B. Barnett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Amelia Ales Barnett v. William B. Barnett, (La. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT AMELIA ALES BARNETT NO. 2022 CW 1253

VERSUS

WILLIAM B. BARNETT FEBRUARY 1, 2023

In Re: William B. Barnett, applying for supervisory writs, 22nd Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Tammany, No. 2021-11416.

BEFORE: GUIDRY, C.J., WOLFE AND MILLER, JJ.

WRIT GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The portions of the trial court's October 18, 2022 judgment, finding the property located at 216 Tchefuncte Drive, Covington, Louisiana ("the Tchefuncte Property") is the separate property of plaintiff, Amelia Ales Barnett ("Amelia") , "to do with as she wishes" and pertaining to any sale of the Tchefuncte Property, are vacated. Procedural due process requires an opportunity to be heard, in addition to notice of the pendency of an action, and in conjunction therewith, adequate notice of the hearing is fundamental. Ikonitski v. Ikonitski, 2016-0642 (La. App. 1st Cir. 9/16/16), 204 So.3d 232, 234. La. Code Civ. P. art. 1571 (A) (1) (a), provides in pertinent part that district courts shall prescribe the procedure for assigning cases for trial by rules, which shall require adequate notice of trial to all parties. See Hill v. Lopez, 2005-0182 (La. App. 1st Cir. 2/22/06), 929 So.2d 80, 82 n.2. The documents before this court do not reflect notice was given to defendant William Barnett ("William") of a hearing on Amelia's Second Supplemental Rule for Authority to Act Alone to Sell Home and for Use of Community Movables, which requested authorization to sell the Tchefuncte Property. There is no evidence that William received actual notice that the rule would be heard on September 14, 2022, as no hearing date was included in the proposed order attached to the Second Supplemental Rule for Authority to Act Alone to Sell Home and for Use of Community Movables. Moreover, nothing in the Rule for Authority to Act Alone to Sell Home and For Use of Community Movables or Supplemental Rule for Authority to Act Alone to Sell Home and for Use of Community Movables, which actually were set for hearing on September 14, 2 022, reflect a request for authority to sell the Tchefuncte Property or that such would be heard and determined on September 14, 2022. In all other respects, the writ is denied.

JMG EW SMM

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT FOR THE COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hill v. Lopez
929 So. 2d 80 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2006)
Ikonitski v. Ikonitski
204 So. 3d 232 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Amelia Ales Barnett v. William B. Barnett, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amelia-ales-barnett-v-william-b-barnett-lactapp-2023.