Amedore v. Peterson
983 N.E.2d 768, 20 N.Y.3d 1006
Opinions
OPINION OF THE COURT
Appellant-respondent having moved for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals and for a stay in the above causes; and respondent-appellant having moved for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals in the above causes; upon the papers filed and due deliberation, it is ordered, that the motions for leave to appeal are denied; and it is further ordered, that the motion for a stay is dismissed as academic.
Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Read, Smith and Pigott. Judge Graffeo dissents in an opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Amedore v. Peterson, 983 N.E.2d 768, 20 N.Y.3d 1006 (N.Y. 2013).
983 N.E.2d 768 (Amedore v. Peterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gross v. Albany County Board of Elections
819 N.E.2d 197 (New York Court of Appeals, 2004)