Home/New York Court of Appeals/Amedore v. Peterson

Amedore v. Peterson

983 N.E.2d 768, 20 N.Y.3d 1006
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 16, 2013
StatusPublished

This text of 983 N.E.2d 768 (Amedore v. Peterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Amedore v. Peterson, 983 N.E.2d 768, 20 N.Y.3d 1006 (N.Y. 2013).

Opinions

OPINION OF THE COURT

Appellant-respondent having moved for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals and for a stay in the above causes; and respondent-appellant having moved for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals in the above causes; upon the papers filed and due deliberation, it is ordered, that the motions for leave to appeal are denied; and it is further ordered, that the motion for a stay is dismissed as academic.

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Read, Smith and Pigott. Judge Graffeo dissents in an opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gross v. Albany County Board of Elections
819 N.E.2d 197 (New York Court of Appeals, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
983 N.E.2d 768, 20 N.Y.3d 1006, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amedore-v-peterson-ny-2013.