Amco Custom Brokerage Co. v. United States
50 Cust. Ct. 332, 1963 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3677
United States Customs Court·Decided June 19, 1963·No. No. 67831; protests 62/6470 and 62/6458 (Philadelphia)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of metal articles wholly or in chief value of iron similar in all material respects to those the subject of Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc. v. United States (47 Cust. Ct. 112, C.D. 2289), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Amco Custom Brokerage Co. v. United States, 50 Cust. Ct. 332, 1963 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3677 (cusc 1963).
50 Cust. Ct. 332 (Amco Custom Brokerage Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc. v. United States
47 Cust. Ct. 112 (U.S. Customs Court, 1961)