AMC Corp. v. Advance Computer Management Group Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

AMC Corp. v. Advance Computer Management Group Inc.

295 A.D.2d 109, 742 N.Y.S.2d 821, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5884

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 4, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 295 A.D.2d 109 (AMC Corp. v. Advance Computer Management Group Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

AMC Corp. v. Advance Computer Management Group Inc., 295 A.D.2d 109, 742 N.Y.S.2d 821, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5884 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Helen Freedman, J.\ entered on or about February 5, 2002, which, to the extent appealed from, denied in part plaintiffs motion for preliminary injunctive relief, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Inasmuch as plaintiff failed to adduce sufficient evidence demonstrating that it was likely to prevail on the merits on its causes for tortious interference with prospective economic advantage, trade disparagement, misappropriation of trade secrets, unfair competition, breach óf fiduciary duty and breach of contract, its motion for broad preliminary injunctive relief was properly denied (see, W.T. Grant Co. v Srogi, 52 NY2d 496, 517). Since plaintiff in its moving papers failed to demonstrate the elements necessary to issuance of a preliminary injunction, no hearing on the motion was required (see, Kvaerner U.S. v Merita Bank, 288 AD2d 6; CPLR 6312 [c]). Concur—Williams, P.J., Saxe, Buckley, Sullivan and Ellerin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Helen Freedman, J.\ entered on or about February 5, 2002, which, to the extent appealed from, denied in part plaintiffs motion for preliminary injunctive relief, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Inasmuch as plaintiff failed to adduce sufficient evidence demonstrating that it was likely to prevail on the merits on its causes for tortious interference with prospective economic advantage, trade disparagement, misappropriation of trade secrets, unfair competition, breach óf fiduciary duty and breach of contract, its motion for broad preliminary injunctive relief was properly denied (see, W.T. Grant Co. v Srogi, 52 NY2d 496, 517). Since plaintiff in its moving papers failed to demonstrate the elements necessary to issuance of a preliminary injunction, no hearing on the motion was required (see, Kvaerner U.S. v Merita Bank, 288 AD2d 6; CPLR 6312 [c]). Concur—Williams, P.J., Saxe, Buckley, Sullivan and Ellerin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

295 A.D.2d 109, 742 N.Y.S.2d 821, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5884, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amc-corp-v-advance-computer-management-group-inc-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack