Ambush v. City of Frederick

Fourth Circuit

Ambush v. City of Frederick

447 F. App'x 481

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 26, 2011·No. No. 11-1192·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Stephanie Davis Ambush appeals the district court’s orders dismissing her various state and Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment procedural and substantive due process claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Ambush v. City of Frederick, No. 1:10-cv-01953-WDQ, 2011 WL 232031 (D.Md. Jan. 24, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Stephanie Davis Ambush appeals the district court’s orders dismissing her various state and Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment procedural and substantive due process claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Ambush v. City of Frederick, No. 1:10-cv-01953-WDQ, 2011 WL 232031 (D.Md. Jan. 24, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Ambush v. City of Frederick, 447 F. App'x 481 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

447 F. App'x 481 (Ambush v. City of Frederick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.