Ambrosio v. Sunbrite Jewelry Manufacturers Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ambrosio v. Sunbrite Jewelry Manufacturers Corp.

70 A.D.2d 677, 416 N.Y.S.2d 762, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12159

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 3, 1979

StatusPublished

This text of 70 A.D.2d 677 (Ambrosio v. Sunbrite Jewelry Manufacturers Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ambrosio v. Sunbrite Jewelry Manufacturers Corp., 70 A.D.2d 677, 416 N.Y.S.2d 762, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12159 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ [678]*678Compensation Board, filed March 2, 1978, which found that claimant had sustained an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment. The board found: "based on the testimony of the claimant and the employer, claimant was an employee of the Sunbrite Jewelry Mfg. Co. and there was an employer-employee relationship within the meaning of the Workmen’s Compensation Law when claimant sustained accident out of and in the course of employment.” There is substantial evidence to support the board’s decision. Decision affirmed, without costs. Sweeney, J. P., Kane, Staley, Jr., Main and Mikoll, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ [678]*678Compensation Board, filed March 2, 1978, which found that claimant had sustained an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment. The board found: "based on the testimony of the claimant and the employer, claimant was an employee of the Sunbrite Jewelry Mfg. Co. and there was an employer-employee relationship within the meaning of the Workmen’s Compensation Law when claimant sustained accident out of and in the course of employment.” There is substantial evidence to support the board’s decision. Decision affirmed, without costs. Sweeney, J. P., Kane, Staley, Jr., Main and Mikoll, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

70 A.D.2d 677, 416 N.Y.S.2d 762, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ambrosio-v-sunbrite-jewelry-manufacturers-corp-nyappdiv-1979.