Ambrosio v. Meo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ambrosio v. Meo

174 A.D. 894

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1916·Published

Opinion

Plaintiff’s testimony in the Supreme Court trial, to the effect that he did not say, ‘ ‘ Stand hack or I will fire," and that at this time he had no revolver, raised an issue as to the truth of the original charge so that the jury might find that defendant’s charge was untrue, and possibly infer therefrom malice and want of probable cause. The judgment of dismissal is therefore, reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant.to abide the event. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Plaintiff’s testimony in the Supreme Court trial, to the effect that he did not say, ‘ ‘ Stand hack or I will fire," and that at this time he had no revolver, raised an issue as to the truth of the original charge so that the jury might find that defendant’s charge was untrue, and possibly infer therefrom malice and want of probable cause. The judgment of dismissal is therefore, reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant.to abide the event. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.

Ambrosio v. Meo, 174 A.D. 894 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

174 A.D. 894 (Ambrosio v. Meo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.