Ambrosino v. Rhode Island Personnel Appeal Board

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Ambrosino v. Rhode Island Personnel Appeal Board

333 A.2d 435, 114 R.I. 932, 1975 R.I. LEXIS 1551

CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island

DecidedFebruary 21, 1975

DocketAppeal No. 75-29

StatusPublished

This text of 333 A.2d 435 (Ambrosino v. Rhode Island Personnel Appeal Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ambrosino v. Rhode Island Personnel Appeal Board, 333 A.2d 435, 114 R.I. 932, 1975 R.I. LEXIS 1551 (R.I. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Plaintiff is ordered to Show Cause why the appeal in the above-entitled matter should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Savings Bank of Newport v. Hawksley, 103 R. I. 741, 241 A.2d 806 (1968); Clark v. Fascio 106 R. I. 751, 264 A.2d 317 (1970). Plaintiff has twenty days from the date'of this order to submit a memorandum in support [933]*933of. his . appeal.

Giovanni Folcarelli, for plaintiff. Julius C. Michaelson, Attorney General, for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Plaintiff is ordered to Show Cause why the appeal in the above-entitled matter should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Savings Bank of Newport v. Hawksley, 103 R. I. 741, 241 A.2d 806 (1968); Clark v. Fascio 106 R. I. 751, 264 A.2d 317 (1970). Plaintiff has twenty days from the date'of this order to submit a memorandum in support [933]*933of. his . appeal.

Giovanni Folcarelli, for plaintiff. Julius C. Michaelson, Attorney General, for defendants.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

333 A.2d 435, 114 R.I. 932, 1975 R.I. LEXIS 1551, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ambrosino-v-rhode-island-personnel-appeal-board-ri-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack