Ambrosino v. Rhode Island Personnel Appeal Board

333 A.2d 435, 114 R.I. 932, 1975 R.I. LEXIS 1551
Supreme Court of Rhode Island·Decided February 21, 1975·No. Appeal No. 75-29·Published

Opinion

Plaintiff is ordered to Show Cause why the appeal in the above-entitled matter should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Savings Bank of Newport v. Hawksley, 103 R. I. 741, 241 A.2d 806 (1968); Clark v. Fascio 106 R. I. 751, 264 A.2d 317 (1970). Plaintiff has twenty days from the date'of this order to submit a memorandum in support [933]*933of. his . appeal.

Giovanni Folcarelli, for plaintiff. Julius C. Michaelson, Attorney General, for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ambrosino v. Rhode Island Personnel Appeal Board, 333 A.2d 435, 114 R.I. 932, 1975 R.I. LEXIS 1551 (R.I. 1975).

333 A.2d 435 (Ambrosino v. Rhode Island Personnel Appeal Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Clark v. Fascio
264 A.2d 317 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1970)
Savings Bank of Newport v. Hawksley
241 A.2d 806 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1968)