Ambrosino v. Bevilacqua

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Ambrosino v. Bevilacqua

374 A.2d 556, 118 R.I. 924, 1977 R.I. LEXIS 2104

CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island

DecidedApril 21, 1977

DocketAppeal No. 76-107

StatusPublished

This text of 374 A.2d 556 (Ambrosino v. Bevilacqua) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ambrosino v. Bevilacqua, 374 A.2d 556, 118 R.I. 924, 1977 R.I. LEXIS 2104 (R.I. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

This case is assigned to the calendar for May 3, 1977, 9:30 a.m., for oral argument. The petitioner will be expected to show cause in what manner the trial justice abused his discretion in denying the petition for mandamus, in view of the trial justice’s finding of fact that petitioner had been directed, in writing, to return to his former position, and in view of the trial justice’s finding of fact that petitioner’s failure to return was attributable to his own lack of diligence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This case is assigned to the calendar for May 3, 1977, 9:30 a.m., for oral argument. The petitioner will be expected to show cause in what manner the trial justice abused his discretion in denying the petition for mandamus, in view of the trial justice’s finding of fact that petitioner had been directed, in writing, to return to his former position, and in view of the trial justice’s finding of fact that petitioner’s failure to return was attributable to his own lack of diligence.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

374 A.2d 556, 118 R.I. 924, 1977 R.I. LEXIS 2104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ambrosino-v-bevilacqua-ri-1977.