Ambrose v. Wurlitzer Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ambrose v. Wurlitzer Co.

27 A.D.2d 732, 277 N.Y.S.2d 160, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4913

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 6, 1967

StatusPublished

This text of 27 A.D.2d 732 (Ambrose v. Wurlitzer Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ambrose v. Wurlitzer Co., 27 A.D.2d 732, 277 N.Y.S.2d 160, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4913 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dat'ed July 29, 1966 and entered in Suffolk County, modified by providing that the examination proceed at the courthouse of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs. The examination shall proceed at a time within 30 days after entry of the order hereon, as specified in a 10-day written notice, or at any other time and place as may be mutually agreed upon by written stipulation. In our opinion it was an improvident exercise of discretion to direct that appellant, over its objection, be examined at the offices of plaintiff’s attorney. Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Brennan, Rabin and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dat'ed July 29, 1966 and entered in Suffolk County, modified by providing that the examination proceed at the courthouse of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs. The examination shall proceed at a time within 30 days after entry of the order hereon, as specified in a 10-day written notice, or at any other time and place as may be mutually agreed upon by written stipulation. In our opinion it was an improvident exercise of discretion to direct that appellant, over its objection, be examined at the offices of plaintiff’s attorney. Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Brennan, Rabin and Munder, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 A.D.2d 732, 277 N.Y.S.2d 160, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4913, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ambrose-v-wurlitzer-co-nyappdiv-1967.