Ambrose v. Community School Board No. 30

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ambrose v. Community School Board No. 30

47 A.D.2d 923, 369 N.Y.S.2d 1001, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9366

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 21, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 47 A.D.2d 923 (Ambrose v. Community School Board No. 30) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ambrose v. Community School Board No. 30, 47 A.D.2d 923, 369 N.Y.S.2d 1001, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9366 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alla, to review a determination which denied petitioner permanent appointment as a tenured teacher, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 1, 1974, which (1) adjudged that petitioner had tenure, (2) directed that she be awarded back pay and (3) directed that she be immediately restored to active service. This appeal also brings up for review an order of the same court, dated August 26, 1974, which, upon reargument, adhered to the prior determination. Judgment reversed and order reversed insofar as it adhered to the prior determination, on the law, without costs, determination confirmed and petition dismissed on the merits. We find that petitioner’s services were validly terminated and that she did not acquire tenure by estoppel or acquiescence. Martuscello, Acting P. J., Latham, Cohalan, Christ and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alla, to review a determination which denied petitioner permanent appointment as a tenured teacher, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 1, 1974, which (1) adjudged that petitioner had tenure, (2) directed that she be awarded back pay and (3) directed that she be immediately restored to active service. This appeal also brings up for review an order of the same court, dated August 26, 1974, which, upon reargument, adhered to the prior determination. Judgment reversed and order reversed insofar as it adhered to the prior determination, on the law, without costs, determination confirmed and petition dismissed on the merits. We find that petitioner’s services were validly terminated and that she did not acquire tenure by estoppel or acquiescence. Martuscello, Acting P. J., Latham, Cohalan, Christ and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

47 A.D.2d 923, 369 N.Y.S.2d 1001, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ambrose-v-community-school-board-no-30-nyappdiv-1975.