Ambrose Calvin v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 10, 2025·No. 4D2025-2027·Published

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

AMBROSE CALVIN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D2025-2027

[September 10, 2025]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Sara Alijewicz, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2013-CF-010201-DXXX-WB.

Ambrose Calvin, Homestead, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee. PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Maye v. State, 368 So. 3d 531, 532 (Fla. 6th DCA 2023), review granted, No. SC2023-1184, 2024 WL 1796831 (Fla. Apr. 25, 2024); Wainwright v. State, 411 So. 3d 392 (Fla. 2025) (even if Erlinger v. United States, 602 U.S. 821 (2024), constitutes a change of law, it does not apply retroactively).

KUNTZ, C.J., MAY and GERBER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ambrose Calvin v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2025).

Ambrose Calvin v. State of Florida (Ambrose Calvin v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Erlinger v. United States
602 U.S. 821 (Supreme Court, 2024)