Home/Connecticut Appellate Court/Ambrogne v. Cazanas

Ambrogne v. Cazanas

569 A.2d 577, 20 Conn. App. 822, 1990 Conn. App. LEXIS 42
CourtConnecticut Appellate Court
DecidedJanuary 31, 1990
Docket7759
StatusPublished

This text of 569 A.2d 577 (Ambrogne v. Cazanas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ambrogne v. Cazanas, 569 A.2d 577, 20 Conn. App. 822, 1990 Conn. App. LEXIS 42 (Colo. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We have fully reviewed the record, transcripts and briefs in this matter. We find nothing that supports the argument that, under the facts of this case, the trial court abused its discretion in dismissing the named defendant’s cross complaint for his failure to appear and prosecute and for his failure to present evidence after being given an opportunity to do so. Nor do we find support for the argument that the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to open the dismissal. Levy v. Levy, 14 Conn. App. 801, 802, 539 A.2d 1042, cert. denied, 208 Conn. 803, 545 A.2d 1100 (1988).

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Levy v. Levy
539 A.2d 1042 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
569 A.2d 577, 20 Conn. App. 822, 1990 Conn. App. LEXIS 42, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ambrogne-v-cazanas-connappct-1990.