Ambrogio v. Beaver Road Associates

808 A.2d 1136, 261 Conn. 943, 2002 Conn. LEXIS 419
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedOctober 9, 2002
DocketSC 16853
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 808 A.2d 1136 (Ambrogio v. Beaver Road Associates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ambrogio v. Beaver Road Associates, 808 A.2d 1136, 261 Conn. 943, 2002 Conn. LEXIS 419 (Colo. 2002).

Opinion

The petition by the defendant Paul DiMascio Construction Company, Inc., for certification for appeal [944]*944from the Appellate Court, 71 Conn. App. 576 (AC 21448), is granted, limited to the following issue:

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16853. Thomas P. Chapman, in support of the petition. Barbara A. Frederick and Richard S. Order, in opposition. Decided October 9, 2002

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiff was not precluded, as a matter of law, from recovering lost profits for breach of his construction contract with the defendant?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ambrogio v. Beaver Road Associates
836 A.2d 1183 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
808 A.2d 1136, 261 Conn. 943, 2002 Conn. LEXIS 419, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ambrogio-v-beaver-road-associates-conn-2002.