Ambrogio Bavaro v. Thomas M. Pederson, District Director of Immigration and Naturalization

Sixth Circuit

Ambrogio Bavaro v. Thomas M. Pederson, District Director of Immigration and Naturalization

283 F.2d 870, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 3549

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedOctober 19, 1960

Docket14116_1

StatusPublished

This text of 283 F.2d 870 (Ambrogio Bavaro v. Thomas M. Pederson, District Director of Immigration and Naturalization) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ambrogio Bavaro v. Thomas M. Pederson, District Director of Immigration and Naturalization, 283 F.2d 870, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 3549 (6th Cir. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER.

The above cause coming on to be heard on an appeal from the order of the District Court in which the Court found that neither the Special Inquiry Officer nor *871 the Board of Immigration Appeals abused their discretion in denying appellant’s application for suspension of deportation, and that their action therein was not arbitrary and capricious, and after a review of the record and upon the filing of the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel in open court, and the court being duly advised,

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the order of the District Court sustaining the order of deportation be and is hereby affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER.

The above cause coming on to be heard on an appeal from the order of the District Court in which the Court found that neither the Special Inquiry Officer nor *871 the Board of Immigration Appeals abused their discretion in denying appellant’s application for suspension of deportation, and that their action therein was not arbitrary and capricious, and after a review of the record and upon the filing of the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel in open court, and the court being duly advised,

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the order of the District Court sustaining the order of deportation be and is hereby affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

283 F.2d 870, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 3549, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ambrogio-bavaro-v-thomas-m-pederson-district-director-of-immigration-and-ca6-1960.