Ambrocio Cano Reyes v. State
This text of Ambrocio Cano Reyes v. State (Ambrocio Cano Reyes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed and Opinion Filed May 26, 2015
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00728-CR
AMBROCIO CANO REYES, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F06-62132-J
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Myers and Brown Opinion by Chief Justice Wright
Ambrocio Cano Reyes appeals his conviction, following the adjudication of his guilt, for
possession with intent to deliver cocaine in an amount of four grams or more but less than 200
grams. See TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. § 481.112(a), (d) (West 2010). The trial court
assessed punishment at fifteen years’ imprisonment. On appeal, appellant’s attorney filed a brief
in which she concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the
requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional
evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See
High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811–12 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he
did not file a pro se response. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–21 (Tex. Crim. App.
2014) (identifying duties of appellate courts and counsel in Anders cases).
We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824,
826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree
the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably
support the appeal.
We affirm the trial court’s judgment.
Do Not Publish TEX. R. APP. P. 47 130728F.U05
/Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
‐2‐
Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT
AMBROCIO CANO REYES, Appellant Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3 of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. No. 05-13-00728-CR V. F06-62132-J). Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright, THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Myers and Brown participating.
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
Judgment entered May 26, 2015.
‐3‐
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ambrocio Cano Reyes v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ambrocio-cano-reyes-v-state-texapp-2015.