Ambro v. Town of Huntington

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ambro v. Town of Huntington

83 A.D.3d 697, 919 N.Y.S.2d 900

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 5, 2011

StatusPublished

This text of 83 A.D.3d 697 (Ambro v. Town of Huntington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ambro v. Town of Huntington, 83 A.D.3d 697, 919 N.Y.S.2d 900 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceed[698]*698ing pursuant to CPLR article 78, the petitioner appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Jones, Jr., J.), dated September 17, 2009, as, sua sponte, confirmed a determination of the same court dated August 28, 2009 (Seidell, J.H.O.), made after a hearing, awarding him an attorney’s fee in the total sum of only $29,500.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The order appealed from, sua sponte, confirmed the Judicial Hearing Officer’s determination and, as such, the order is not appealable as of right (see CPLR 5701 [a] [2]). Under the circumstances, we decline to grant leave to appeal from the order. Skelos, J.P., Balkin, Austin and Hall, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceed[698]*698ing pursuant to CPLR article 78, the petitioner appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Jones, Jr., J.), dated September 17, 2009, as, sua sponte, confirmed a determination of the same court dated August 28, 2009 (Seidell, J.H.O.), made after a hearing, awarding him an attorney’s fee in the total sum of only $29,500.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The order appealed from, sua sponte, confirmed the Judicial Hearing Officer’s determination and, as such, the order is not appealable as of right (see CPLR 5701 [a] [2]). Under the circumstances, we decline to grant leave to appeal from the order. Skelos, J.P., Balkin, Austin and Hall, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

83 A.D.3d 697, 919 N.Y.S.2d 900, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ambro-v-town-of-huntington-nyappdiv-2011.