Ambro v. Dorman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ambro v. Dorman

245 A.D. 848

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 15, 1935·Published

Opinion

The parties having agreed in open court that this appeal may be decided by a court of four justices, the decision is as follows: Order denying petitioner’s motion for a peremptory mandamus order directing John J. Dorman, as chairman, and John J. Callahan, as secretary, of the county committee of the Democratic party of Kings county, to authenticate and file with the board of elections the list of election inspectors submitted from the nineteenth Assembly district of Kings county by the petitioner, Jerome G. Ambro, unanimously affirmed, without costs, as a matter of law and not in the exercise of discretion. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Tompkins and Johnston, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The parties having agreed in open court that this appeal may be decided by a court of four justices, the decision is as follows: Order denying petitioner’s motion for a peremptory mandamus order directing John J. Dorman, as chairman, and John J. Callahan, as secretary, of the county committee of the Democratic party of Kings county, to authenticate and file with the board of elections the list of election inspectors submitted from the nineteenth Assembly district of Kings county by the petitioner, Jerome G. Ambro, unanimously affirmed, without costs, as a matter of law and not in the exercise of discretion. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Tompkins and Johnston, JJ.

Ambro v. Dorman, 245 A.D. 848 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

245 A.D. 848 (Ambro v. Dorman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.