Ambriz K. MacK v. Unifund CCR Partners
This text of Ambriz K. MacK v. Unifund CCR Partners (Ambriz K. MacK v. Unifund CCR Partners) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 3, 2008.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-08-00396-CV
AMBRIZ K. MACK, Appellant
V.
UNIFUND CCR PARTNERS, Appellee
On Appeal from County Civil Court at Law No. 4
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 903253
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
This is an attempted appeal from a judgment signed January 30, 2008. A motion to vacate was filed April 23, 2008. Appellant=s notice of appeal was filed April 30, 2008.
The notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after the judgment is signed when appellant has not filed a timely motion for new trial, motion to modify the judgment, motion to reinstate, or request for findings of fact and conclusion of law. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1
Appellant=s notice of appeal was not filed timely. A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in good faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by rule 26.1, but within the fifteen-day grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion for extension of time. See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617-18 (Tex. 1997) (construing the predecessor to Rule 26). However, the appellant must offer a reasonable explanation for failing to file the notice of appeal in a timely manner. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3, 10.5(b)(1)(C); Verburgt, 959 S.W.2d at 617-18. Appellant=s notice of appeal was not filed within the fifteen-day period provided by rule 26.3
On May 29, 2008, notification was transmitted to all parties of the Court=s intent to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). Appellant filed no response.
Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.
PER CURIAM
Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed July 3, 2008.
Panel consists of Justices Frost, Seymore, and Guzman.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ambriz K. MacK v. Unifund CCR Partners, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ambriz-k-mack-v-unifund-ccr-partners-texapp-2008.