Ambler v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Ambler v. State

1912 OK CR 301, 122 P. 1128, 7 Okla. Crim. 720, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 107

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedApril 19, 1912

DocketNo. A-963.

StatusPublished

This text of 1912 OK CR 301 (Ambler v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ambler v. State, 1912 OK CR 301, 122 P. 1128, 7 Okla. Crim. 720, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 107 (Okla. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was on an tion which charged obtaining a license therefor, and was sentenced to pay a fine of one hundred dollars. The judgment and sentence was entered on August 12, 1910. An appeal was attempted to be taken by filing in this court, petition in error with case-made on December 3, 1910. The Attorney General filed a motion to dismiss said appeal because the petition in error was not filed in this court within the sixty days allowed by statute, and no etxension of time for taking the appeal was granted by the court. It is just as essential to have the order of the trial court extending the statutory time within which to take an appeal as it is to have the time extended within which to make and serve the ease-made. An examination of the record discloses that the motion to dismiss the appeal is well taken. The purported appeal is therefore dismissed and the ease remanded to the county court of Payne county.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was on an tion which charged obtaining a license therefor, and was sentenced to pay a fine of one hundred dollars. The judgment and sentence was entered on August 12, 1910. An appeal was attempted to be taken by filing in this court, petition in error with case-made on December 3, 1910. The Attorney General filed a motion to dismiss said appeal because the petition in error was not filed in this court within the sixty days allowed by statute, and no etxension of time for taking the appeal was granted by the court. It is just as essential to have the order of the trial court extending the statutory time within which to take an appeal as it is to have the time extended within which to make and serve the ease-made. An examination of the record discloses that the motion to dismiss the appeal is well taken. The purported appeal is therefore dismissed and the ease remanded to the county court of Payne county.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1912 OK CR 301, 122 P. 1128, 7 Okla. Crim. 720, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 107, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ambler-v-state-oklacrimapp-1912.