Ambler v. Church
1 Root 211
This text of 1 Root 211 (Ambler v. Church) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ambler v. Church, 1 Root 211 (Colo. Ct. App. 1790).
Opinion
The justice is not liable in damages for not calling said action at the time, and rendering judgment under the circumstances. There is no pretense of partiality or corruption, and even if the justice erred in judgment it ought not to mahe him liable.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Craig v. Burnett
32 Ala. 728 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1858)
Case v. Shepherd
2 Johns. Cas. 27 (New York Supreme Court, 1800)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Root 211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ambler-v-church-connsuperct-1790.