Amblard v. Heard

9 Mass. 489
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1813
StatusPublished

This text of 9 Mass. 489 (Amblard v. Heard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Amblard v. Heard, 9 Mass. 489 (Mass. 1813).

Opinion

By the Court.

The plaintiff cannot have execution against Mr. Heard personally. He should have attended to the entering up his judgment in the original suit. That judgment was against the effects of the bankrupt in the hands of his assignee. It might have been entered for the costs against the assignee himself. We do not inquire whether the plaintiff is equitably entitled to these costs against the defendant. He has brought his scire facias to have execution of a judgment, which was rendered against the effects of the bankrupt. To this writ the defendant has pleaded that he has no effects. He is not estopped to plead this; and therefore let judgment be entered that the defendant’s plea in bar is good

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 Mass. 489, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amblard-v-heard-mass-1813.