Amberg v. Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BUTTE DIVISION EDWARD AMBERG, SARAH CV 24—-70-BU-—DLC JACKLIN, JAIME BANCROFT, and RACHEL JOHNSON, Plaintiffs, ORDER

VS. TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA, Defendant. On August 20, 2024, Defendant filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint. (Doc. 5.) Subsequently, on September 10, 2024, Plaintiffs filed a First Amended Complaint (Doc. 10), which moots Defendant’s earlier motion. Ramirez

v. Cty. of San Bernardino, 806 F.3d 1002, 1008 (9th Cir. 2015). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 5) is DENIED as moot. This order has no effect on the pendency of Defendant’s motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint (Doc. 14). DATED this 28th day of October, 2024.

Dana L. Christensen, District Judge United States District Court