Amber R. v. Pediatric & Adolescent Urgent Care of Western New York
This text of Amber R. v. Pediatric & Adolescent Urgent Care of Western New York (Amber R. v. Pediatric & Adolescent Urgent Care of Western New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
State of New York Court of Appeals This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports.
No. 70 SSM 2 Amber R., &c., Appellant, v. Pediatric & Adolescent Urgent Care of Western New York, PLLC et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.
Submitted by Timothy W. Hoover, for appellant. Submitted by Kathleen M. Sweet, for respondents.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order reversed, with costs, and order of Supreme Court, Erie County, reinstated. Triable issues of fact exist as to the claim for medical malpractice with respect to the placement of the endotracheal tube in the infant (see Vega v Restani Constr. Corp., 18 NY3d 499, 503 [2012]). Chief Judge Wilson and Judges Rivera, Garcia, Singas, Cannataro, Troutman and Halligan concur.
Decided April 18, 2024
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Amber R. v. Pediatric & Adolescent Urgent Care of Western New York, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amber-r-v-pediatric-adolescent-urgent-care-of-western-new-york-ny-2024.