Amber Jack v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 17, 2020
Docket04-20-00448-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Amber Jack v. State (Amber Jack v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Amber Jack v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas September 17, 2020

No. 04-20-00448-CR

Amber Latia JACK, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2017CR13552 The Honorable Jennifer Pena, Judge Presiding

ORDER On May 29, 2018, appellant was convicted of possession of a controlled substance and sentenced to eight years community supervision. On March 20, 2019, the State filed a motion to revoke appellant’s community supervision, and on July 30, 2020, the trial court modified the conditions of appellant’s community supervision. On September 3, 2020, appellant filed a notice of appeal, seeking to appeal the trial court’s order modifying the conditions of her community supervision. Modification of community supervision is not appealable at the time of modification. See Davis v. State, 195 S.W.3d 708, 710 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (“There is no legislative authority for entertaining a direct appeal from an order modifying the conditions of community supervision.”); Basaldua v. State, 558 S.W.2d 2, 5 (Tex. Crim. App. 1977); Quaglia v. State, 906 S.W.2d 112, 113 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1995, no pet.). A defendant may appeal the judgment at the time she is placed on community supervision or her revocation of community supervision. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 42.12, § 23(b); Quaglia, 906 S.W.2d at 113. Here, appellant did not timely appeal from the judgment placing her on community supervision, and the clerk’s record does not contain an order revoking her community supervision. It appears we do not have jurisdiction over this appeal. We therefore ORDER appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction by October 19, 2020. All appellate deadlines are suspended pending further order of this court. _________________________________ Beth Watkins, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 17th day of September, 2020.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Davis v. State
195 S.W.3d 708 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2006)
Basaldua v. State
558 S.W.2d 2 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1977)
Quaglia v. State
906 S.W.2d 112 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Amber Jack v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amber-jack-v-state-texapp-2020.