Amber Ione Arnold v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 7, 2013
Docket10-12-00098-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Amber Ione Arnold v. State (Amber Ione Arnold v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Amber Ione Arnold v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-12-00098-CR

AMBER IONE ARNOLD, Appellant v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

From the 66th District Court Hill County, Texas Trial Court No. 36,793

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Amber Ione Arnold’s counsel has filed a motion to dismiss this

appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a).

Rule 42.2(a) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure states:

At any time before the appellate court’s decision, the appellate court may dismiss the appeal upon the appellant’s motion. The appellant and his or her attorney must sign the written motion to dismiss and file it in duplicate with the appellate clerk, who must immediately send the duplicate copy to the trial court clerk. Id. We have not issued a decision in this appeal. The motion is signed by Arnold’s

attorney, and although Arnold did not sign the motion itself, she did sign an affidavit in

which she swore to having read the motion and acknowledged that the facts contained

in the motion are true and correct. Arnold’s trial counsel has also attached to the

motion to dismiss the transcript of a hearing held by the trial court on January 8, 2013 in

which Arnold states that she wishes to dismiss her appeal. The motion, affidavit, and

statement on the record are a sufficient basis on which to dismiss the appeal. See

Hendrix v. State, 86 S.W.3d 762, 763-64 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, no pet.); White v. State,

993 S.W.2d 381, 382 (Tex. App—Waco 1999, no pet.).

The motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is dismissed. Arnold’s pending

motion for abatement of this appeal is dismissed as moot.

REX D. DAVIS Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Appeal dismissed Opinion delivered and filed February 7, 2013 Do not publish [CR25]

Arnold v. State Page 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hendrix v. State
86 S.W.3d 762 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2002)
Torrance White v. State
993 S.W.2d 381 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Amber Ione Arnold v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amber-ione-arnold-v-state-texapp-2013.