Amazon.com Inc. v. aalitood
This text of Amazon.com Inc. v. aalitood (Amazon.com Inc. v. aalitood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 2 3 4
5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 AMAZON.COM INC, et al., 9 Plaintiffs, Case No. C23-679-MJP 10 v. ORDER 11 AALITOOD, et al., 12 Defendants. 13
14 On May 10, 2023, Plaintiffs Amazon.com Inc., Amazon.com Services LLC, Canon 15 Kabushiki Kaisha, and Canon USA Inc. filed a complaint against entities responsible for 29 16 Amazon Selling Accounts, along with a notice that the case is a “Counterfeit Enforcement 17 Action subject to General Order 03-23.” (Dkt. ## 1, 4.) On August 21, 2023, the Honorable 18 Marsha J. Pechman referred the case to the undersigned pursuant to General Order 03-23 for all 19 issues related to service. (Dkt. # 7; see General Order 03-23 (W.D. Wash.).) 20 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) provides that the Court—on motion or on its own 21 after notice to plaintiff—must dismiss an action without prejudice against a defendant, or order 22 that service be made within a specified time, if the defendant is not served within 90 days after 23 the complaint is filed. However, if plaintiff shows good cause for the failure, the Court must 1 extend the time for service for an appropriate period. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m); Efaw v. Williams, 2 473 F.3d 1038, 1041 (9th Cir. 2007) (“District courts have broad discretion to extend time for 3 service under Rule 4(m).”). In deciding whether to exercise that discretion, the Court may 4 consider factors such as a statute of limitations bar, prejudice to the defendant, actual notice of a
5 lawsuit, and eventual service. Efaw, 473 F.3d at 1041 (citing Troxell v. Fedders of N. Am., Inc., 6 160 F.3d 381, 383 (7th Cir. 1998)). 7 More than 90 days have elapsed since Plaintiffs filed their complaint. Accordingly, 8 Plaintiffs are ORDERED to file a status report by September 8, 2023, providing proof of service 9 or good cause why an extension should be granted. 10 Dated this 23rd day of August, 2023. 11 A 12 MICHELLE L. PETERSON United States Magistrate Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Amazon.com Inc. v. aalitood, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amazoncom-inc-v-aalitood-wawd-2023.