Amazon Services, LLC and Kenzie's Optics, Inc. v. Benjamin D. Winston, II
Opinion
NO. 12-22-00163-CV
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
TYLER, TEXAS
AMAZON SERVICES, LLC AND § APPEAL FROM THE 159TH KENZIE’S OPTICS, INC., APPELLANTS § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT V.
BENJAMIN D. WINSTON, II, § ANGELINA COUNTY, TEXAS APPELLEE
MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM Appellants, Amazon Services, LLC and Kenzie’s Optics, Inc., filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal, stating that they no longer wish to pursue the appeal. Appellants’ motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Opinion delivered November 9, 2022. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J. COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS
JUDGMENT
NOVEMBER 9, 2022
AMAZON SERVICES, LLC AND KENZIE’S OPTICS, INC., Appellants V. BENJAMIN D. WINSTON, II, Appellee
Appeal from the 159th District Court of Angelina County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. CV-01103-21-06)
THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the unopposed motion of the Appellants to dismiss the appeal herein, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that the motion to dismiss be granted and the appeal be dismissed, and that the decision be certified to the court below for observance. By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Amazon Services, LLC and Kenzie's Optics, Inc. v. Benjamin D. Winston, II (Amazon Services, LLC and Kenzie's Optics, Inc. v. Benjamin D. Winston, II) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.