Amazon Management Corp. v. Abokrek

183 Misc. 204, 52 N.Y.S.2d 880, 1944 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2782
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided November 10, 1944·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Memorandum

Per Curiam.

There was no breach of the terms of the lease on the part of the landlord by reason of his failure to supply screens. Nor was the deposit by the tenants with the clerk of the court of the rent, without the costs and disbursements, sufficient to warrant a dismissal of the petition. (See Civ. Prac. Act, § 1435, subd. 1; Matter of Flewwellin v. Lent, 91 App. Div. 430.)

The final order should be reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs to the landlord, and final order directed for the landlord.

Smith, McCooey and Steinbrink, JJ., concur.

Order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Amazon Management Corp. v. Abokrek, 183 Misc. 204, 52 N.Y.S.2d 880, 1944 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2782 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1944).

183 Misc. 204 (Amazon Management Corp. v. Abokrek) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

609 Holding Corp. v. Burke
202 Misc. 709 (New York Supreme Court, 1952)
Hirsch v. Raymond
199 Misc. 840 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1951)