Amaya v. Board of Education
This text of 43 A.D.3d 837 (Amaya v. Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Solomon, J.), dated January 13, 2006, as denied, with leave to renew, their cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint was properly denied, with leave to renew. Under the facts of this case, discovery should first be completed (see CPLR 3212 [f]). Prudenti, EJ., Fisher, Lifson and Angiolillo, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
43 A.D.3d 837, 840 N.Y.S.2d 923, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amaya-v-board-of-education-nyappdiv-2007.