Amaya v. Amaya

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Amaya v. Amaya

132 S.W.3d 218, 355 Ark. 127, 2003 Ark. LEXIS 625

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedNovember 20, 2003

Docket03-1157

StatusPublished

This text of 132 S.W.3d 218 (Amaya v. Amaya) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Amaya v. Amaya, 132 S.W.3d 218, 355 Ark. 127, 2003 Ark. LEXIS 625 (Ark. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion by Kenneth S. Gallant, of the University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law Legal Aid Clinic, attorney for appellant, requesting that the filing fee in this matter be waived, was denied on November 6, 2003. On that date, counsel filed the record in this matter and paid the $100.00 filing fee.

Counsel for appellant is directed to attempt to contact appellant at her last known or best address, informing her that she has thirty days from the date of this per curiam to obtain substitute counsel and her failure to do so may result in her appeal being dismissed. If, at the end of the thirty-day period, the attorney for appellant has not been contacted by his client or the appellant has not otherwise made arrangements to proceed with her appeal, counsel’s motion to withdraw as counsel will be granted. Ark. R. Civ. P. 64.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The motion by Kenneth S. Gallant, of the University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law Legal Aid Clinic, attorney for appellant, requesting that the filing fee in this matter be waived, was denied on November 6, 2003. On that date, counsel filed the record in this matter and paid the $100.00 filing fee.

Counsel for appellant is directed to attempt to contact appellant at her last known or best address, informing her that she has thirty days from the date of this per curiam to obtain substitute counsel and her failure to do so may result in her appeal being dismissed. If, at the end of the thirty-day period, the attorney for appellant has not been contacted by his client or the appellant has not otherwise made arrangements to proceed with her appeal, counsel’s motion to withdraw as counsel will be granted. Ark. R. Civ. P. 64.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

132 S.W.3d 218, 355 Ark. 127, 2003 Ark. LEXIS 625, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amaya-v-amaya-ark-2003.